Composite Hockey Stick or Wood Hockey Stick? - nike bauer vapor wood grain
A constant battle, it seems that no one ever not.
Both advantages and disadvantages, but it is better ...
Durability of wood and the feel of the puck
Composite powerful shot well and Flex.
Nobody really knows. But my choice is actually a time ... I have a Nike Bauer Vapor 7 and 692 Wood TACK CCM hockey stick. I like the feel of a wooden stick, the disk is much more in dealing with their stick as a club track without hollow or foam and pieces of wood only ****,. However, the links a great technology to have such as shooting, cords, and others. But what do you think ...
Wood? or composite?
Monday, January 25, 2010
Nike Bauer Vapor Wood Grain Composite Hockey Stick Or Wood Hockey Stick?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
I love my wooden chopsticks. I've tried connections. But I always come back to a piece of wood. I am currently 5030th with a Sherwood PMP Love it. They also used the PMP-700. That's fine too. My vote is for wood.
I would say go with what feels comfortable to you. Here's how a new business or something to test play. I like compounds, but only because it is lighter. But really, it depends on who you are and what you want, proof that sometimes ..
Good luck!
Wood breaks easily.
Compounds are plans for good and so on.
Even if you have a good idea for the CD and big stick handling and shooting feels good, is a two-bedroom apartments. prefer just a bit quiet, but the blade and shaft are separated from much of what I say.
I have a piece of wood for street hockey, we used washers, and it's great!
I do not like so much flex Everything you need is strength. with which it is broken. the pro-cheap.
Connection is the best option Tho. although they are expensive, do not break me.
one must ask how a player or a baseball bat is made of metal wood club of his choice
I am a goalie and use of wood. less bounce to it when compared with the connection. But I have a rbk and wood, but it has a shiny appearance that it creates the impression compounds.
I am a goalie and use of wood. less bounce to it when compared with the connection. But I have a rbk and wood, but it has a shiny appearance that it creates the impression compounds.
Composites are more durable, gives you a faster shooting and the cost a little more money:]. Give me stay because they are simply better than the wooden sticks in general, with the exception of the price
Compounds have a better chance and are thus more easily.
Compounds have a better chance and are thus more easily.
Children, such as compounds of these days ...
go with the wood. obtain a Sherwood for $ 30. and as well as a connection. It seems lighter than the shaft of my complex task. I think my Sherwood and my warrior (main Ice Hockey Club) have the same flex but it could set the force. Connections are expensive, but there are some that can be found, for example, the price Bauer NIKE 25 that the dollar will cost 45-60, but my friend broke with one blow. The forests are much more durable than composites. NHL look at the compounds 6-10 is about as broken for 1-2 in wood. If you get a connection, do a 2-room and just put a piece of wood
I am a goalkeeper, who also plays out / coach on occasion.
In the nets until I at least for the moment. The comparison of the life of my current stock composite (Reebok, 7 months and counting) to my last piece of wood (Nike Bauer, and almost 5 months apart). Composite is also much easier, that's great. This price is almost the same, to be honest. To be somewhere around $ 100 U.S.. My only complaint about the composition appears to have been written a play inside and rattles occasionally.
Playing outside ... I would not mind a composite stick, but not in my budget. I went to Dick's Sporting Goods and buy a piece of wood under $ 20, and I will take some time. The biggest problem I see is the price and chipping / hour. Financially, I think the forest is an asset.
Post a Comment